South Africa’s foreign policy has traditionally been characterized by a commitment to multilateralism, non-alignment, and a focus on African solidarity. However, the complexities of the Russia-Ukraine conflict have tested these principles, compelling South Africa to navigate a delicate diplomatic path. The recent engagement between Presidents Ramaphosa and Zelensky offers a lens through which to assess South Africa’s evolving diplomatic posture.
Historical Context of South Africa’s Position
Historically, South Africa has maintained a cautious approach to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Following Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014, South Africa refrained from direct condemnation, emphasizing the importance of dialogue and the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity. This stance was influenced by historical ties with Russia, dating back to the Soviet Union’s support during the anti-apartheid struggle.
In 2022, South Africa abstained from a United Nations vote condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, a decision that drew criticism from various quarters. Ukrainian Ambassador to South Africa, Liubov Abravitova, expressed concern over South Africa’s neutrality, highlighting the challenges in engaging with the South African government on this issue.
The Pretoria Meeting: A Shift in Engagement
On April 24, 2025, President Ramaphosa hosted President Zelensky in Pretoria, marking a significant development in South Africa’s engagement with Ukraine. The meeting focused on bilateral relations and discussions on the ongoing conflict. President Ramaphosa commended President Zelensky for agreeing to an unconditional ceasefire, emphasizing the importance of diplomacy and inclusive dialogue in resolving the conflict.
Le Guardian
This meeting signifies a nuanced shift in South Africa’s approach, balancing its historical ties with Russia and its commitment to peaceful conflict resolution. By engaging directly with Ukraine, South Africa demonstrates a willingness to play a more active role in facilitating dialogue between the conflicting parties.
Contrasting International Responses
The international community’s responses to the Russia-Ukraine conflict have varied, reflecting differing geopolitical interests and alliances. The United States, under President Donald Trump, has taken a more assertive stance, urging Russia to cease its attacks on Ukraine and proposing a peace deal that includes recognizing Russia’s annexation of Crimea—a proposal firmly rejected by President Zelensky.
European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, have condemned Russia’s actions, emphasizing the need for unconditional ceasefires and the importance of upholding international law.
Implications for South Africa’s Foreign Policy
South Africa’s engagement with both Russia and Ukraine reflects its commitment to a balanced foreign policy. By maintaining open channels with both parties, South Africa positions itself as a potential mediator, advocating for peaceful resolutions through dialogue. This approach aligns with its historical emphasis on multilateralism and non-alignment.
However, this balancing act is not without challenges. Domestically, there have been divergent views on South Africa’s stance. The Western Cape Government, led by the opposition Democratic Alliance, has taken a more critical view of Russia’s actions, illuminating government buildings in the colors of the Ukrainian flag and condemning the invasion.
The meeting between Presidents Ramaphosa and Zelensky represents a significant moment in South Africa’s diplomatic engagement with the Russia-Ukraine conflict. While maintaining its historical ties with Russia, South Africa’s direct engagement with Ukraine underscores its commitment to peaceful conflict resolution and multilateral dialogue. As the conflict continues, South Africa’s role as a potential mediator will depend on its ability to navigate complex geopolitical dynamics while upholding its core foreign policy principles.
